Avatar VS The Shape of Water: Screenplay notes!

Avatar Vs The Shape of Water

The Science Behind Hollywood Screenplays: Unveiling the Art of Narrative Evolution

Introduction:
Hollywood has mastered the art of captivating audiences by seamlessly blending scientific methods with creative storytelling. While the basic plot structures may appear repetitive, filmmakers employ strategic tweaks in point of view, narrative method, and characterization to breathe new life into familiar stories. One such example is the intriguing resemblance between the Oscar-winning “The Shape of Water” and the blockbuster “Avatar,” where seemingly disparate narratives share a common framework.

Narrative Evolution and Point of View:
Hollywood screenplays often undergo a transformative process to keep audiences engaged. By changing the point of view, filmmakers offer fresh perspectives on classic plot structures. In “The Shape of Water” and “Avatar,” the protagonists both start as common individuals facing oppressive antagonists. However, the shift in point of view allows the audience to connect with the characters on a deeper level, fostering empathy and engagement.

Narrative Method and Structural Variations:
The science of storytelling involves experimenting with narrative methods and structural variations. In both movies, the filmmakers employ unique storytelling techniques to present familiar themes in innovative ways. “The Shape of Water” explores a love story between a mute woman and a humanoid amphibian, while “Avatar” delves into the connection between humans and the indigenous Na’vi people on Pandora. These narrative methods infuse new energy into age-old plot structures, capturing the audience’s imagination.

Characterization:
Character development plays a crucial role in shaping the audience’s emotional connection with the story. Hollywood utilizes scientific methods to craft characters that resonate with viewers. In “The Shape of Water” and “Avatar,” the protagonists undergo transformative journeys, defying expectations and overcoming challenges. The relatable struggles of these characters contribute to the films’ universal appeal.

Tweaking Story Worlds and Settings:
To keep narratives fresh, Hollywood often tweaks story worlds and settings. While the core plot structures may share similarities, the distinctive environments of “The Shape of Water” and “Avatar” contribute to their unique identities. Whether it’s the underwater laboratory in “The Shape of Water” or the lush, otherworldly landscapes of Pandora in “Avatar,” these settings become integral components of the storytelling process.

Conclusion:
Hollywood’s use of scientific methods in screenplay writing involves a delicate balance of innovation and familiarity. By strategically altering point of view, narrative method, and characterization, filmmakers breathe new life into classic plot structures. “The Shape of Water” and “Avatar” serve as compelling examples of how slight tweaks can result in distinct cinematic experiences, keeping audiences enthralled and invested in the art of storytelling.

Sai Vijendhiran